Just war theory, humanitarian intervention, and the need for a democratic federation

Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):493-555 (2011)
Abstract
The primary purpose of government is to secure public goods that cannot be achieved by free markets. The Coordination Principle tells us to consolidate sovereign power in a single institution to overcome collective action problems that otherwise prevent secure provision of the relevant public goods. There are several public goods that require such coordination at the global level, chief among them being basic human rights. The claim that human rights require global coordination is supported in three main steps. First, I consider Pogge's and Habermas's analyses as alternatives to Hobbesian conceptions of justice. Second, I consider the core conventions of international law, which are in tension with the primacy of state sovereignty in the UN system. Third, I argue that the just war tradition does not limit just causes for war to self-defense; it supports saving innocent third parties from crimes against humanity as a just reason for war. While classical authors focused less on this issue, the point is especially clear in twentieth-century just war theories, such as those offered by the American Catholic bishops, Jean Elshtain, Brian Orend, and Michael Walzer. Against Walzer, I argue that we add intractable military tyranny to the list of horrors meriting intervention if other ad bellum conditions are met. But these results require us to reexamine the "just authority" of first resort to govern such interventions. The Coordination Principle implies that we should create a transnational federation with consolidated powers in place of a treaty organization requiring near-unanimity. But to be legitimate, such a global institution must also be directly answerable to the citizens of its member states. While the UN Security Council is inadequate on both counts, a federation of democracies with a directly elected executive and legislature could meet both conditions
Keywords collective action problems  Luban  United Nations  state sovereignty  league of democracies  Orend  Habermas  human rights  public goods  global governance  Walzer  crimes against humanity  just cause for war
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,374
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Kurt Baier (1958). The Moral Point of View. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

View all 35 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Gregory Reichberg (2002). Just War or Perpetual Peace? Journal of Military Ethics 1 (1):16-35.
J. Bryan Hehir (1992). Just War Theory In A Post-Cold War World. Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (2):237 - 257.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-08-04

Total downloads

21 ( #78,438 of 1,096,840 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #31,184 of 1,096,840 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.