Social Epistemology 25 (4):401 - 421 (2011)
|Abstract||Contemporary developed western economies are commonly referred to as ?knowledge-based? economies, which compete through drawing on the innovative and creative capacities of their local populations. Economic policy-makers must invest in and conserve the social, cultural and public resources that underpin dynamic and disruptive competitive activities, namely technological innovation and entrepreneurship, which bring new ideas and products to market. But these resources defy orthodox forms of economic knowledge and quantification. Their trajectories and outcomes are intrinsically uncertain. The paper draws on interviews with experts who advise governments on innovation and competitiveness, to understand what expert strategies are used to deal with this epistemological problem. Such experts must project and retain epistemological authority, but without lapsing too far into quantitative, economistic and bureaucratic forms of reason. The paper identifies three ways in which knowledge of the future can be validated, but without disguising uncertainty: it can be presented as practically useful; as aesthetically appealing; and as hinting at some ?ultimate? form of ontological knowledge|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Markus F. Peschl & Thomas Fundneider, Emergent Innovation—a Socio-Epistemological Innovation Technology. Creating Profound Change and Radically New Knowledge as Core Challenges in Knowledge Management.
Sang-Chul Park (2012). Competitiveness of East Asian Science Cities: Discourse on Their Status as Global or Local Innovative Clusters. [REVIEW] AI and Society 27 (4):451-464.
Stephen John (2011). Expert Testimony and Epistemological Free-Riding: The Mmr Controversy. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):496-517.
Rosemarie Tong (1991). The Epistemology and Ethics of Consensus: Uses and Misuses of 'Ethical' Expertise. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):409-426.
Michel Quéré (1994). Economic Cohesion and Innovation Systems in Europe. AI and Society 8 (2):131-141.
Alfons Bora (2010). Knowledge and the Regulation of Innovation. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):73-86.
Benoît Godin (2010). Innovation Without the Word: William F. Ogburn's Contribution to the Study of Technological Innovation. [REVIEW] Minerva 48 (3):277-307.
Harold Silver (1999). Managing to Innovate in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):145 - 156.
Walter Valdivia (2011). The Stakes in Bayh-Dole: Public Values Beyond the Pace of Innovation. Minerva 49 (1):25-46.
Benoît Godin (2012). “Innovation Studies”: The Invention of a Specialty. [REVIEW] Minerva 50 (4):397-421.
Robert M. Veatch (1991). Consensus of Expertise: The Role of Consensus of Experts in Formulating Public Policy and Estimating Facts. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):427-445.
Niklas Gudowsky, Walter Peissl, Mahshid Sotoudeh & Ulrike Bechtold (2012). Forward-Looking Activities: Incorporating Citizens' Visions. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):101-123.
Oliver R. Scholz (2009). Experts: What They Are and How We Recognize Them—a Discussion of Alvin Goldman's Views. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):187-205.
Wendy Ann Adams (2008). A Transdisciplinary Ontology of Innovation Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (2):147-174.
Added to index2011-10-26
Total downloads15 ( #85,942 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?