Hypatia 17 (2):145-161 (2002)
|Abstract||: In neocolonial contexts of globalization, the epistemological terrain of radical diversity poses significant ethical challenges to transnational feminisms. In view of historical associations between knowledge and discourses of love which were conditioned by imperialist brands of humanism and benevolence under colonialism, this paper argues for a deconstructionist approach to conceptualizing love in relation to knowledge and for an ethics that severs the association with benevolence, instead making alterity the basis for its account|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marguerite La Caze (2005). Love, That Indispensable Supplement: Irigaray and Kant on Love and Respect. Hypatia 20 (3):92-114.
Bence Nanay (2009). Imagining, Recognizing and Discriminating. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):699-717.
İlham Dilman (1998). Love: Its Forms, Dimensions, and Paradoxes. St. Martin's Press.
Bence Nanay (2009). Imagining, Recognizing and Discriminating: Reconsidering the Ability Hypothesis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):699-717.
James H. Olthuis (ed.) (1997). Knowing Other-Wise: Philosophy at the Threshold of Spirituality. Fordham University Press.
Mari Ruti (2012). The Singularity of Being: Lacan and the Immortal Within. Fordham University Press.
Paul Noordhof (2003). Something Like Ability. Australian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):21-40.
Vrinda Dalmiya (2009). The Metaphysics of Ethical Love: Comparing Practical Vedanta and Feminist Ethics. Sophia 48 (3):221-235.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,123 of 722,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?