Loptson on Anselm and Davis
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (3):245 - 249 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMark Owen Webb (2005). In Defense of Anselm. Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Jeremy Gwiazda (2011). On Making the Same Choice Eternally: A Reply to Davis. Sophia 50 (4):693-696.
Stephen T. Davis (1976). Anselm and Question-Begging: A Reply to William Rowe. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (4):448 - 457.
Peter J. Loptson (1980). Anselm, Meinong, and the Ontological Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (3):185 - 194.
Stephen T. Davis (1975). Anselm and Gaunilo on the 'Lost Island'. Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):435-448.
Peter Loptson (1986). Conceiving as Existent: A Final Rejoinder to Davis. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (1/2):123 - 125.
Stephen T. Davis (1976). Anselm And Question-Begging: A Reply To William Rowe'S Comments On Professor Davis' 'Does The Ontological Argument Beg The Question'. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7:448-457.
Peter Loptson (1984). Anselm and Rowe: A Reply to Davis. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15 (1/2):67 - 71.
Stephen T. Davis (1982). Loptson on Anselm and Rowe. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):219 - 224.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,761 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
