David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):325 - 356 (2004)
John Milbank appropriates John Ruskin as part of his "Augustinian" tradition. Milbank's selective reading, however, omits Ruskin's fixed hierarchies as well as his acknowledgment of conflict in economic life. Neither of these ideas fits the social aesthetics of harmony and difference that Milbank claims is unique to Christian theology. While Milbank's strictly theoretical portrait of theology gains critical force from Ruskin's robust account of social practices and just exchange, Milbank lacks effective historical and institutional responses to the problems in Ruskin's corpus. This deficiency undermines Milbank's dichotomy between theology and secular reason
|Keywords||secular reason aesthetics social practices Milbank charity capitalism John Ruskin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Berkman & Frederick C. Bauerschmidt (1996). II. Absolutely Fabulous and Civil. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):435-446.
James Wetzel (2004). Splendid Vices and Secular Virtues: Variations on Milbank's Augustine. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):271 - 300.
Anthony J. Godzieba (1996). I. Fear and Loathing in Modernity. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):419-433.
Gordon E. Michalson (2004). Re-Reading the Post-Kantian Tradition with Milbank. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):357 - 383.
Jennifer A. Herdt (2004). The Endless Construction of Charity: On Milbank's Critique of Political Economy. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):301 - 324.
Charles Harvey & Jon Press (1995). John Ruskin and the Ethical Foundations of Morris & Company, 1861–96. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):181 - 194.
John Bowlin (2004). Introduction: Parts, Wholes, and Opposites: John Milbank as "Geisteshistoriker". Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):257 - 269.
Sydney Waterlow (1912). Book Review:The Life of Ruskin. E. T. Cook; Ruskin: A Study in Personality. A. C. Benson. [REVIEW] Ethics 23 (1):95-.
Michael M. Waddell (2008). Faith and Reason in the Wake of Milbank and Pickstock. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):381-396.
R. Hewison, I. Warrell & S. Wildman, (Exhibition - 260works) Ruskin, Turner and the Pre-Raphaelites: Works by Ruskin, 19th Century Artists and Old Masters.
O. O'Donovan (1992). Book Review : Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, by John Milbank. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990. 443 Pp. 45. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 5 (1):80-86.
Michael J. Hollerich (1999). John Milbank, Augustine, and the “Secular”. Augustinian Studies 30 (2):311-326.
A. Lubowski-Jahn (2011). A Comparative Analysis of the Landscape Aesthetics of Alexander von Humboldt and John Ruskin. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):321-333.
Benjamin Sargent (2012). John Milbank and Biblical Hermeneutics: The End of the Historical-Critical Method? Heythrop Journal 53 (2):253-263.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads6 ( #229,925 of 1,410,002 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #107,552 of 1,410,002 )
How can I increase my downloads?