Neither mentioning 'brains in a vat' nor mentioning brains in a vat will prove that we are not brains in a vat
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):891-896 (1991)
|Abstract||In Reason, Truth, and History Hilary Putnam has presented an anti-skeptical argument purporting to prove that we are not brains in a vat. How exactly the argument goes is somewhat controversial. A number of competing "recon¬structions" have been proposed. They suffer from a defect which they share with what seems to be Putnam's own version of the argument. In this paper, I examine a very simple and rather natural reconstruction of the argument, one that does not employ any premises in which a sentence, viz. the sentence 'I am a brain in a vat', is mentioned rather than used. In this respect my version of the argument is importantly different from what appears to be Putnam's own version.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Pavel Tichý (1986). Putnam on Brains in a Vat. Philosophia 16 (2):137-146.
Henry Jackman (2001). Semantic Pragmatism and A Priori Knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (4):455 - 480.
Kirk Ludwig (1992). Brains in a Vat, Subjectivity, and the Causal Theory of Reference. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:313-345.
Anthony L. Brueckner (1986). Brains in a Vat. Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):148-167.
Anthony Brueckner (1992). If I Am a Brain in a Vat, Then I Am Not a Brain in a Vat. Mind 101 (401):123-128.
Bredo C. Johnsen (2003). Of Brains in Vats, Whatever Brains in Vats May Be. Philosophical Studies 112 (3):225 - 249.
Mark Sprevak & Christina McLeish (2004). Magic, Semantics, and Putnam's Vat Brains. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (2):227-236.
Crispin Wright (1992). On Putnam's Proof That We Are Not Brains in a Vat. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92:67--94.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #30,852 of 549,014 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #6,739 of 549,014 )
How can I increase my downloads?