David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (3):423 - 448 (2000)
William James undertook to steer his way between a rationalistic system that was not empirical enough and an empirical system so materialistic that it could not account for the value commitments on which it rested. In arguing against both the absolutists (gnostics) and the empiricists (agnostics), he defined a position of pluralistic moralism that seemed equally distant from both, leaving himself vulnerable to the criticism that he had rescued morality from scientism only by reducing religion to morals. Such criticism, however, ignores distinctions James made between religion and theology and between monistic theology and dualistic theology. When these distinctions are taken into account, it becomes evident that James can be criticized for reducing religion to morality only from the point of view of either absolute monism or religious humanism and that radical empiricism not only embraces a significant number of nonmoral religious experiences but also leaves open the possibility of belief in the particular historical God of traditional Christianity
|Keywords||William James Philosophy of religion Reduction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael R. Slater (2009). William James on Ethics and Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Jeremy Carrette (2005). Pt. 2. James, Psychology and Religion. Listening to James a Century Later : The Varieties as a Resource for Renewing the Psychology of Religion / David M. Wulff ; the Varieties, the Principles and Psychology of Religion : Unremitting Inspiration From a Different Source / Jacob A. Belzen ; Passionate Belief : William James, Emotion and Religious Experience. [REVIEW] In Jeremy R. Carrette (ed.), William James and the Varieties of Religious Experience: A Centenary Celebration. Routledge
David C. Lamberth (1999). William James and the Metaphysics of Experience. Cambridge University Press.
Max Carl Otto (ed.) (1942). William James. Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
Bennett Ramsey (1993). Submitting to Freedom: The Religious Vision of William James. Oxford University Press.
James O. Pawelski (2001). Heaven's Champion: William James's Philosophy of Religion (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of Speculative Philosophy 15 (1):56-61.
Jeremy R. Carrette (ed.) (2005). William James and the Varieties of Religious Experience: A Centenary Celebration. Routledge.
Daniel J. Bronstein (1969). Approaches to the Philosophy of Religion. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Celal Türer (2006). The Challenge of William James's Philosophy of Religion. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:25-30.
Julius Seelye Bixler (1926). Religion in the Philosophy of William James. Boston: Marshall Jones Company.
Michael R. Slater (2008). Pragmatism, Realism, and Religion. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):653-681.
James G. S. Wilson (2003). Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited (Review). Journal of Speculative Philosophy 17 (4):323-325.
Ann Taves (2009). Bridging Science and Religion: "The More" and "the Less" in William James and Owen Flanagan. Zygon 44 (1):9-17.
Kurt Keljo & Tom Christenson (2003). On the Relation of Morality and Religion: Two Lessons From James'sVarieties of Religious Experience. Journal of Moral Education 32 (4):385-396.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads20 ( #130,548 of 1,699,696 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #88,892 of 1,699,696 )
How can I increase my downloads?