On Wittgenstein's Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough for Jacques Bouveresse
Philosophical Investigations 11 (2):147-150 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBrian R. Clack (2003). Response to Phillips. Religious Studies 39 (2):203-209.
R. J. Anderson, J. A. Hughes & W. W. Sharrock (1984). II. Wittgenstein and Comparative Sociology. Inquiry 27 (1-4):268-276.
Jacques Bouveresse (2007). Wittgenstein's Critique of Frazer. Ratio 20 (4):357–376.
Paul Redding (1987). Anthropology as Ritual: Wittgenstein's Reading of Frazer's the Golden Bough. Metaphilosophy 18 (3-4):253-269.
R. R. Marett (1923). The Golden Bough The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. Abridged Edition. By Sir J. G. Frazer. One Vol. 8vo. Pp. Xvi + 756, with Frontispiece. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1922. 18s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 37 (3-4):83-84.
Costis M. Coveos (1990). Wittgenstein on Frazer's Golden Bough. Philosophy 65 (254):518-.
Richard Eldridge (1987). Hypotheses, Criterial Claims, and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein's 'Remarks on Frazer's The Golden Bough'. Philosophical Investigations 10 (3):226-245.
Brian R. Clack (1999). Wittgenstein, Frazer, and Religion. St. Martin's Press.
W. Warde Fowler (1891). Frazer's Golden Bough The Golden Bough; a Study in Comparative Religion. By J. G. Frazer, M.A. (Macmillan & Co.). The Classical Review 5 (1-2):48-52.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads24 ( #52,469 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
