David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 3 (1-2):33- (1953)
Recent accounts of the life of Protagoras differ widely from one another in their treatment of the ancient sources, and in the conclusions which they draw from them. A re-examination of the evidence, undertaken in 1949–50 as part of a study of the Prometheus trilogy, has convinced me that a new discussion is urgently needed if we are to place the earlier stages of the sophistic movement in the right context historically; and the purpose of this paper is to lay at least a part of the foundation for such a discussion. Since the evidence for the life of Protagoras includes some allusions to his relations with Democritus, and there are some obvious affinities between the careers of Protagoras and Anaxagoras, I have added a short account of the relevant points in the biography of Democritus and a more detailed study of the evidence for the life of Anaxagoras
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mi-Kyoung Lee (2005). Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Oxford University Press.
M. R. Wright (1988). Morality and Self-Interest in Protagoras, Antiphon and Democritus. Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):117-121.
D. T. J. Bailey (2006). Review: Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle and Democritus. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (460):1151-1153.
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
Luca Castagnoli (2007). Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus, by Mi-Kyoung Lee. Ancient Philosophy 27 (2):405-418.
Timothy Chappell (2010). Mi-Kyoung Lee's Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Philosophical Books 51 (2):117-125.
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras on Matter, Motion, and Multiple Worlds. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):443-454.
C. C. W. Taylor (2007). Nomos and Phusis in Democritus and Plato. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):1-20.
Kamil Sokołowski & Michał Bizoń (2012). A Note to Protagoras 353de. Phronesis 57 (4):319-331.
Raphael Woolf (2006). (M.-K.) Lee Epistemology After Protagoras. Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Oxford UP, 2005. Pp. X + 291. £45. 0199262225. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 126:211-212.
James Warren (2006). Lee (M.-K.) Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus . Pp. Xii + 291. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005. Cased, £45. ISBN: 0-19-926222-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 56 (01):59-.
Robert Pasnau (2007). Democritus and Secondary Qualities. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2):99-121.
Tim O'Keefe (1997). The Ontological Status of Sensible Qualities for Democritus and Epicurus. Ancient Philosophy 17 (1):119-134.
Michael Nill (1985). Morality and Self-Interest in Protagoras, Antiphon, and Democritus. E.J. Brill.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads15 ( #238,049 of 1,796,209 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #208,919 of 1,796,209 )
How can I increase my downloads?