Psychologism in the Logic of John Stuart Mill: Mill on the Subject Matter and Foundations of Ratiocinative Logic
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (2):115-143 (2005)
This paper considers the question of whether Mill's account of the nature and justificatory foundations of deductive logic is psychologistic. Logical psychologism asserts the dependency of logic on psychology. Frequently, this dependency arises as a result of a metaphysical thesis asserting the psychological nature of the subject matter of logic. A study of Mill's System of Logic and his Examination reveals that Mill held an equivocal view of the subject matter of logic, sometimes treating it as a set of psychological processes and at other times as the objects of those processes. The consequences of each of these views upon the justificatory foundations of logic are explored. The paper concludes that, despite his providing logic with a prescriptive function, and despite his avoidance of conceptualism, Mill's theory fails to provide deductive logic with a justificatory foundation that is independent of psychology.
|Keywords||J. S. Mill System of Logic psychologism logic foundations of logic ratiocination ratiocinative logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Elliott Sober (1978). Psychologism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 8 (July):165-91.
Glenn Kessler (1980). Frege, Mill, and the Foundations of Arithmetic. Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):65-79.
Adrian Cussins (1987). Varieties of Psychologism. Synthese 70 (1):123 - 154.
Jonathan Cohen (1998). Frege and Psychologism. Philosophical Papers 27 (1):45-67.
Richard R. Brockhaus (1991). Realism and Psychologism in 19th Century Logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3):493-524.
Citations of this work BETA
Steffen Ducheyne (2008). J.S. Mill's Canons of Induction: From True Causes to Provisional Ones. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):361-376.
Francis J. Pelletier, Renée Elio & Philip Hanson (2008). Is Logic All in Our Heads? From Naturalism to Psychologism. Studia Logica 88 (1):3 - 66.
Similar books and articles
John V. Strong (1978). John Stuart Mill, John Herschel, and the 'Probability of Causes'. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:31 - 41.
John Stuart Mill (1950/2005). Philosophy of Scientific Method. Dover Publications.
Geoffrey Scarre (1984). Proof and Implication in Mill's Philosophy of Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (1):19-37.
John Stuart Mill (1843). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. University of Toronto Press.
Jack W. Meiland (1976). Psychologism in Logic: Husserl's Critique. Inquiry 19 (1-4):325 – 339.
John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson Editor of the Text & Introfduction by R. F. Mcrae (2006). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. Books IV-Vi and Appendices. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Liberty Fund
John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson Editor of the Text & Introfduction by R. F. Mcrae (2006). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. Books I-III. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Liberty Fund
John Richards (1980). Boole and Mill: Differing Perspectives on Logical Psychologism. History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2):19-36.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads34 ( #94,254 of 1,725,565 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #59,846 of 1,725,565 )
How can I increase my downloads?