Report cards
Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (3 & 4):161 – 165 (2004)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChristopher Meyers (2007). Clinical Ethics Consulting and Conflict of Interest: Structurally Intertwined. Hastings Center Report 37 (2):32-40.
Hans P. Van Ditmarsch (2006). The Logic of Pit. Synthese 149 (2):343 - 374.
Hans P. Van Ditmarsch (2006). The Logic of Pit. Synthese 149 (2).
Michael Dummett & Kamal Abu-Deeb (1973). Some Remarks on Mamluk Playing Cards. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 36:106-128.
Yujin Nagasawa (2007). Surgeon Report Cards and the Concept of Defensive Medicine. In Yujin Nagasawa & Steve Clarke Justin Oakley (eds.), Informed Consent and Clinical Accountability: The Ethics of Auditing and Reporting Surgeon Performance. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph C. D'Oronzio (1995). Health Policy Watch: “Unexpected” Death and Other Report Cards on Access and Ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (04):549-.
Shawn Richard, Shail Rawal & Douglas Martin (2005). An Ethical Framework for Cardiac Report Cards: A Qualitative Study. BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-7.
Hans Van Ditmarsch (2003). The Russian Cards Problem. Studia Logica 75 (1):31 - 62.
Hans van Ditmarsch (2003). The Russian Cards Problem. Studia Logica 75 (1).
Steve Clarke & Justin Oakley (2004). Informed Consent and Surgeons' Performance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):11 – 35.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,239 of 549,017 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,017 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
