Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):99-104 (1992)
|Abstract||Mary Midgley asserts that my argument concerning the problem of child-abuse was inappropriately framed in the language of rights, and neglected certain pertinent natural facts. I defend the view that the use of rights-talk was both apposite and did not misrepresent the moral problem in question. I assess the status and character of the natural facts Midgley adduces in criticism of my case, concluding that they do not obviously establish the conclusions she believes they do. Finally I briefly respond to the charge that my suggestions were illiberal|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mary Midgley (1983). Selfish Genes and Social Darwinism. Philosophy 58 (225):365-.
John H. Dreher (2002). Can There Be Brute, Contingent Moral Facts. Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):23 - 30.
Hugh V. McLachlan (2010). Moral Rights to Life, Both Natural and Non-Natural: Reflections on James Griffin's Account of Human Rights. Diametros 26:58-76.
Alan Soble (1985). Book Review:Rights, Killing, and Suffering. R. G. Frey; Animals and Why They Matter. Mary Midgley; The Case for Animal Rights. Tom Regan. [REVIEW] Ethics 96 (1):192-.
Mary Midgley (1984/2001). Wickedness. Routledge.
Mary Midgley & Stephen R. L. Clark (1980). The Absence of a Gap Between Facts and Values. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 54:207 - 240.
David Archard (1990). Child Abuse: Parental Rights and the Interests of the Child. Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):183-194.
Mary Midgley (1991). Rights-Talk Will Not Sort Out Child-Abuse: Comment on Archard on Parental Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 8 (1):103-114.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads5 ( #160,518 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 551,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?