So You Think You Are a Darwinian?

Philosophy 69 (269):267 - 277 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most educated people nowadays, I believe, think of themselves as Darwinians. If they do, however, it can only be from ignorance: from not knowing enough about what Darwinism says. For Darwinism says many things, especially about our species, which are too obviously false to be believed by any educated person; or at least by an educated person who retains any capacity at all for critical thought on the subject of Darwinism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche was no Darwinian.Patrick Forber - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):369–382.
Can Darwinian Inheritance Be Extended from Biology to Epistemology?Carla E. Kary - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:356 - 369.
Darwinian impacts: an introduction to the Darwinian revolution.David Roger Oldroyd - 1980 - Kensington, Australia: New South Wales University Press.
Getting Scientific with Religion:A Darwinian Solution... Or Not?Barak Morgan - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (3-4):192-230.
Race and language in the Darwinian tradition (and what Darwin's language–species parallels have to do with it).Gregory Radick - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):359-370.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
55 (#284,290)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references