British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):297-300 (2004)
|Abstract||Berys Gaut has recently defended a cluster account of art. He proposes it as superior to other anti-essentialist positions. I argue that his defence of this claim is unconvincing. Not only is the cluster theory consistent with the current crop of disjunctive definitions, it is at its most plausible when seen in such terms.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Claudio F. Costa (2011). A Meta-Descriptivist Theory of Proper Names. Ratio 24 (3):259-281.
Derek Matravers (2007). Institutional Definitions and Reasons. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):251-257.
William C. Frederick (forthcoming). The Technological Value Cluster (Value Cluster IV). The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:200-204.
Eric Chwang (2012). Cluster Randomization and Political Philosophy. Bioethics 26 (9):476-484.
T. A. Cavanaugh (2010). Temporal Indiscriminateness: The Case of Cluster Bombs. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1).
David B. Boersema (1988). Is the Descriptivist / Cluster Theory of Reference “Wrong From the Fundamentals”? Philosophy Research Archives 14:517-538.
Francis Longworth & Andrea Scarantino (2010). The Disjunctive Theory of Art: The Cluster Account Reformulated. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):151-167.
Berys Gaut (2005). The Cluster Account of Art Defended. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):273-288.
Thomas Adajian (2003). On the Cluster Account of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):379-385.
Aaron Meskin (2007). The Cluster Account of Art Reconsidered. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):388-400.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #12,961 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,790 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?