The Impact of Roman Catholic Moral Theology on End-of-Life Care Under the Texas Advance Directives Act
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Christian Bioethics 12 (1):65-82 (2006)
This essay reviews the Roman Catholic moral tradition surrounding treatments at the end of life together with the challenges presented to that tradition by the Texas Advance Directives Act. The impact on Catholic health care facilities and physicians, and the way in which the moral tradition should be applied under this statute, particularly with reference to the provision dealing with conflicts over end-of-life treatments, will be critically assessed. I will argue, based on the traditional treatment of end-of-life issues, that Catholic physicians and institutions should appeal to the conflict resolution process of the Advance Directives Act only under a limited number of circumstances. The implications, under the Texas statute, of varied interpretations of Pope John Paul II's recent allocution on artificial feeding and hydration in the persistent vegetative state will also be considered
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David M. Zientek (2013). Artificial Nutrition and Hydration in Catholic Healthcare: Balancing Tradition, Recent Teaching, and Law. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 25 (2):145-159.
Similar books and articles
David J. Doukas, Using the Family Covenant in Planning End-of-Life Care: Obligations and Promises of Patients, Families, and Physicians.
Stefania Negri (ed.) (2012). Self-Determination, Dignity and End-of-Life Care: Regulating Advance Directives in International and Comparative Perspective. M. Nijhoff Pub..
M. D. David M. Zientek (2005). The Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999: An Exercise in Futility? HEC Forum 17 (4):245-259.
Ellen W. Bernal (2008). Review of Planning for Uncertainty: Living Wills and Other Advance Directives for You and Your Family , 2nd Edition by David John Doukas, M.D., and William Reichel, M.D. [REVIEW] Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3 (1):1-3.
Elizabeth Heitman & Virginia Gremillion (2001). Ethics Committees Under Texas Law: Effects of the Texas Advance Directives Act. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 13 (1):82-104.
E. Furberg (2012). Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
J. Vollmann (2001). Advance Directives in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease; Ethical and Clinical Considerations. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):161-167.
Benjamin H. Levi & Michael J. Green (2010). Too Soon to Give Up: Re-Examining the Value of Advance Directives. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):3 – 22.
Robert L. Fine (2001). The Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999: Politics and Reality. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 13 (1):59-81.
Jim Stone (1994). Advance Directives, Autonomy and Unintended Death. Bioethics 8 (3):223–246.
Violeta Beširević (2010). End-of-Life Care in the 21st Century: Advance Directives in Universal Rights Discourse. Bioethics 24 (3):105-112.
John Mahoney (1987). The Making of Moral Theology: A Study of the Roman Catholic Tradition. Oxford University Press.
Violeta Be Irević (2010). End-of-Life Care in the 21st Century: Advance Directives in Universal Rights Discourse. Bioethics 24 (3):105-112.
Chris Hackler, Ray Moseley & Dorothy E. Vawter (eds.) (1989). Advance Directives in Medicine. Praeger.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads9 ( #379,583 of 1,935,081 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,530 of 1,935,081 )
How can I increase my downloads?