David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1998)
Michael Davis, a leading figure in the study of professional ethics, offers here both a compelling exploration of engineering ethics and a philosophical analysis of engineering as a profession. After putting engineering in historical perspective, Davis turns to the Challenger space shuttle disaster to consider the complex relationship between engineering ideals and contemporary engineering practice. Here, Davis examines how social organization and technical requirements define how engineers should (and presumably do) think. Later chapters test his analysis of engineering judgement and autonomy empirically, engaging a range of social science research including a study of how engineers and managers work together in ten different companies.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$56.43 used (62% off) $70.25 new (52% off) $117.59 direct from Amazon (19% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||TA157.D32 1998|
|ISBN(s)||058524569X 0195120515 9780195120516|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Neelke Doorn (2012). Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):69-90.
Joseph R. Herkert (2005). Ways of Thinking About and Teaching Ethical Problem Solving: Microethics and Macroethics in Engineering. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):373-385.
Jessica Li & Shengli Fu (2012). A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):339-349.
Byron Newberry (2004). The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):343-351.
Michael Davis (2012). “Ain't No One Here But Us Social Forces”: Constructing the Professional Responsibility of Engineers. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):13-34.
Similar books and articles
Michael Pritchard & Mark Holtzapple (1997). Responsible Engineering: Gilbane Gold Revisited. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):217-230.
P. Aarne Vesilind (1998). Engineering, Ethics, and the Environment. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph R. Herkert (2001). Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):403-414.
Michael Davis (2003). What's Philosophically Interesting About Engineering Ethics? Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):353-361.
Simon Robinson (ed.) (2007). Engineering, Business and Professional Ethics. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
Armin Grunwald (2001). The Application of Ethics to Engineering and the Engineer's Moral Responsibility: Perspectives for a Research Agenda. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):415-428.
Michael Davis (1997). Is There a Profession of Engineering? Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):407-428.
Michael Davis (2001). The Professional Approach to Engineering Ethics: Five Research Questions. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):379-390.
Michael Davis (1995). An Historical Preface to Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):33-48.
Michael Davis (2009). Is Engineering a Profession Everywhere? Philosophia 37 (2):211-225.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #53,310 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?