David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Society 7 (2):215-226 (2008)
Historically, cognitivists considered moral choices to be determined by analytic processes. Recent theories, however, have emphasized the role of intuitive processes in determining moral choices. We propose that the engagement of analytic and intuitive processes is contingent on the type of tradeoff being considered. Specifically, when a tradeoff necessarily violates a moral principle no matter what choice is made, as in tragic tradeoffs, its resolution should result in greater moral conflict and less confidence in choice than when the tradeoff offers a moral escape route, as in taboo tradeoffs. We manipulated tradeoff type in between subjects design and confirmed the prediction that tragic tradeoffs prompt more conflict and less confidence than taboo tradeoffs. The findings further revealed that moral conflict mediated the effect of tradeoff type on confidence. The study sheds light on the manner in which human minds resolve moral problems involving social agents
|Keywords||Analytic and intuitive processes Subjective mental effort Problem difficulty Moral choice Confidence Moral conflict Omission bias Trolley problem|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Fiery Cushman, Liane Young & Marc Hauser (2006). The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment. Psychological Science 17 (12):1082-1089.
Philippa Foot (1967). The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Oxford Review 5:5-15.
Jonathan Haidt (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail. Psychological Review 108 (4):Psychological Review.
Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky (1982). Variants of Uncertainty. Cognition 11 (2):143-157.
Shaun Nichols & Ron Mallon (2006). Moral Dilemmas and Moral Rules. Cognition 100 (3):530-542.
Citations of this work BETA
Han Gong, Rumen Iliev & Sonya Sachdeva (forthcoming). Consequences Are Far Away: Psychological Distance Affects Modes of Moral Decision Making. Cognition.
Similar books and articles
Barteld Kooi & Allard Tamminga (2008). Moral Conflicts Between Groups of Agents. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (1):1-21.
Daniel Pekarsky (1983). Moral Choice and Education. Journal of Moral Education 12 (1):3-13.
Warren French & David Allbright (1998). Resolving a Moral Conflict Through Discourse. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):177-194.
David Carr (2003). Character and Moral Choice in the Cultivation of Virtue. Philosophy 78 (2):219-232.
Jim Vernon (2008). The Moral Necessity of Moral Conflict in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):67-80.
Christopher Knapp (2007). Trading Quality for Quantity. Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (1):211-233.
Daniel McInerny (2006). The Difficult Good: A Thomistic Approach to Moral Conflict and Human Happiness. Fordham University Press.
William R. Swinyard, Thomas J. DeLong & Peng Sim Cheng (1989). The Relationship Between Moral Decisions and Their Consequences: A Tradeoff Analysis Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (4):289 - 297.
Michael Weisberg (2004). Qualitative Theory and Chemical Explanation. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1071-1081.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads3 ( #224,045 of 1,088,782 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?