Trying to define art as the sum of the arts
|Abstract||defining art conjunctively, that is, by defining the individual arts and joining these definitions in an exhaustive list. I suggest that the individual art forms are no easier to define than is the general category of art. As well, not everything falling within a given art form counts as art, not every instance of art in the given medium falls within the art form, and some artworks do not belong to an art form at all, so conjoining definitions of the individual art forms (supposing they could be defined) would not map the extension of ’art’. Taken together, these problems indicate that the approach advocated here to art’s definition cannot be successful or convincing.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Dominic McIver Lopes (2007). Conceptual Art is Not What It Seems. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Davies (2007/2010). Philosophical Perspectives on Art. New York;Oxford University Press.
James O. Young (2001). Art and Knowledge. Routledge.
Noël Carroll (2009). Les Culs-de-Sac of Enlightenment Aesthetics: A Metaphilosophy of Art. Metaphilosophy 40 (2):157-178.
Kathleen Kadon Desmond (2011). Ideas About Art. Wiley-Blackwell.
Tiffany Sutton (2000). The Classification of Visual Art: A Philosophical Myth and its History. Cambridge University Press.
Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) (1976). Culture and Art: An Anthology. Humanities Press.
Alex Aliyev (2009). The Intentional-Attributive Definition of Art. Consciousness, Literature and the Arts 10 (2).
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #145,673 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?