David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 2 (1):40 (1990)
Bentham's dictum, ‘everybody to count for one, nobody for more than one’, is frequently noted but seldom discussed by commentators. Perhaps it is not thought contentious or exciting because interpreted as merely reminding the utilitarian legislator to make certain that each person's interests are included, that no one is missed, in working the felicific calculus. Since no interests are secure against the maximizing directive of the utility principle, which allows them to be overridden or sacrificed, the dictum is not usually taken to be asserting fundamental rights that afford individuals normative protection against the actions of others or against legislative policies deemed socially expedient. Such non-conventional moral rights seem denied a place in a utilitarian theory so long as the maximization of aggregate happiness remains the ultimate standard and moral goal
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Green (1987). The Logic of Special Rights. Hypatia 2 (1):67 - 70.
Serene J. Khader (2008). When Equality Justifies Women's Subjection: Luce Irigaray's Critique of Equality and the Fathers' Rights Movement. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 48-74.
Rodney G. Peffer, What is to Be Distributed? The Paideia Project.
Alexander Brown (2007). An Egalitarian Plateau? Challenging the Importance of Ronald Dworkin's Abstract Egalitarian Rights. Res Publica 13 (3):255-291.
A. Schäfer & R. W. Trapp (1989). Distributional Equality in Non-Classical Utilitarianism — A Proof of Lerner's Theorem for ‘Utilitarianism Incorporating Justice’. Theory and Decision 26 (2):157-173.
S. Scheffler & V. Munoz-Dardé (2005). Equality and Division: Values in Principle. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79 (79):255-284.
David Lyons (1994). Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Hugh Starkey (1992). Back to Basic Values: Education for Justice and Peace in the World. Journal of Moral Education 21 (3):185-192.
Mark Rowlands (2009). Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads24 ( #155,380 of 1,792,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #73,278 of 1,792,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?