David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 4 (5):744-755 (2009)
The primary purpose of the performing arts is to prepare and present 'artistic performances', performances that either are themselves the appreciative focuses of works of art or are instances of other things that are works of art. In the latter case, we have performances of what may be termed 'performed works', as is generally taken to be so with performances of classical music and traditional theatrical performances. In the former case, we have what may be termed 'performance-works', as, for example, in free improvisations. Where we have performances of performed works, a number of distinctive philosophical questions arise: What kind of thing is a performed work? How is it appreciated through its performances? Is 'authenticity' an artistically relevant quality of performances of performed works, and, if so, why? How much of what goes on in the performing arts is rightly viewed as the performance of performed works? Artistic performances, whether or not they are of performed works, raise philosophical questions of their own. Can a performance itself be rightly viewed as a work of art? How do improvisation and rehearsal enter into the performing arts, and how do they bear on the appreciation of artistic performances? What role does the audience play in such performances? Does the performer's use of her own body as an artistic medium, as for example in dance performance, generate special constraints on appreciation? How, finally, does what is usually classified as 'performance art' relate to activities in the performing arts more generally construed? I critically survey the ways in which these questions have been addressed by principal theorists in the field.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philip Alperson (1984). On Musical Improvisation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (1):17-29.
Bruce Baugh (1988). Authenticity Revisited. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46 (4):477-487.
Lee Brown (2000). Phonography, Repetition and Spontaneity. Philosophy and Literature 24 (1):111-125.
Ben Caplan & Carl Matheson (2006). Defending Musical Perdurantism. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):59-69.
Richard Cochrane (2000). Playing by the Rules: A Pragmatic Characterization of Musical Performances. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (2):135-142.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Derek Matravers (2005). Two Comments and a Problem for David Davies' Performance Theory. Acta Analytica 20 (4):32-40.
Stephen Davies (1991). The Ontology of Musical Works and the Authenticity of Their Performances. Noûs 25 (1):21-41.
Meike Wagner & Wolf-Dieter Ernst (eds.) (2008). Performing the Matrix: Mediating Cultural Performance. Epodium Verlag.
John Dilworth (2002). Theater, Representation, Types and Interpretation. American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (2):197-209.
Sherri Irvin (2009). Theatrical Performances and the Works Performed. Journal of Aesthetic Education 43 (3):pp. 37-50.
C. Tillman & J. Spencer (2012). Musical Materialism and the Inheritance Problem. Analysis 72 (2):252-259.
Christy Mag Uidhir (2007). Recordings as Performances. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):298-314.
Stephen Davies (2001). Musical Works and Performances: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford University Press.
John Dilworth (2003). A Counter-Example to Theatrical Type Theories. Philosophia 31 (1-2):165-170.
Added to index2009-07-26
Total downloads45 ( #42,931 of 1,413,357 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #26,440 of 1,413,357 )
How can I increase my downloads?