David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 16 (2):101-118 (2010)
Those who commit crime on a grand scale, numbering their victims in the thousands, seem to pose a special problem both for consequentialist and for non-consequentialist theories of punishment, a problem the International Criminal Court makes practical. This paper argues that at least one non-consequentialist theory of punishment, the fairness theory, can provide a justification of punishment for great crimes. It does so by dividing the question into two parts, the one of proportion which it answers directly, and the other of ‘anchoring points’ which it assigns to a broader theory of enforcement (which may have a non-consequentialist or consequentialist version).
|Keywords||International criminal court War crimes Enforcement Punishment Crimes against humanity Fairness theory Retributivism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard J. Arneson (1982). The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics 92 (4):616-633.
Michael Davis (1983). How to Make the Punishment Fit the Crime. Ethics 93 (4):726-752.
Michael Davis (1996). Justice in the Shadow of Death: Rethinking Capital and Lesser Punishments. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Michael Davis (1987). Nozick's Argument for the Legitimacy of the Welfare State. Ethics 97 (3):576-594.
Michael Davis (2009). Punishment Theory's Golden Half Century: A Survey of Developments From (About) 1957 to 2007. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 13 (1):73 - 100.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Whitley Kaufman (2008). The Rise and Fall of the Mixed Theory of Punishment. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):37-57.
Alan Wertheimer (1977). Punishing the Innocent — Unintentionally. Inquiry 20 (1-4):45 – 65.
David Wood (2010). Punishment: Consequentialism. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
Antony Duff (2003). Punishment, Communication and Community. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Matt Matravers (2000). Justice and Punishment: The Rationale of Coercion. Oxford University Press.
Matt K. Stichter (2010). Rescuing Fair-Play as a Justification for Punishment. Res Publica 16 (1):73-81.
D. Dolinko (1997). Retributivism, Consequentialism, and the Intrinsic Goodness of Punishment. Law and Philosophy 16 (5):507-528.
Thom Brooks (2003). Kant's Theory of Punishment. Utilitas 15 (02):206-.
Greg Roebuck & David Wood (2011). A Retributive Argument Against Punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads19 ( #94,117 of 1,101,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,836 of 1,101,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?