David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 5 (2):199-219 (1992)
This paper critically examines the claim that parallel distributed processing (PDP) networks are autonomous learning systems. A PDP model of a simple distributed associative memory is considered. It is shown that the 'generic' PDP architecture cannot implement the computations required by this memory system without the aid of external control. In other words, the model is not autonomous. Two specific problems are highlighted: (i) simultaneous learning and recall are not permitted to occur as would be required of an autonomous system; (ii) connections between processing units cannot simultaneously represent current and previous network activation as would be required if learning is to occur. Similar problems exist for more sophisticated networks constructed from the generic PDP architecture. We argue that this is because these models are not adequately constrained by the properties of the functional architecture assumed by PDP modelers. It is also argued that without such constraints, PDP researchers cannot claim to have developed an architecture radically different from that proposed by the Classical approach in cognitive science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Marr (1982). Vision. Freeman.
Jerry A. Fodor (1975). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press.
Jerry A. Fodor & Zenon W. Pylyshyn (1988). Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture. Cognition 28 (1-2):3-71.
Paul Smolensky (1988). On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):1-23.
Citations of this work BETA
L. Shastri & V. Ajjanagadde (1993). From Simple Associations to Systematic Reasoning: A Connectionist Representation of Rules, Variables, and Dynamic Binding Using Temporal Synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):417-51.
Garrison W. Cottrell (1993). From Symbols to Neurons: Are We There Yet? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):454.
Mike Oaksford & Mike Malloch (1993). Computational and Biological Constraints in the Psychology of Reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):468.
Michael R. W. Dawson & Istvan Berkeley (1993). Making a Middling Mousetrap. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):454.
John E. Hummel & Keith J. Holyoak (1993). Distributing Structure Over Time. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):464.
Similar books and articles
Holger Schultheis & Thomas Barkowsky (2011). Casimir: An Architecture for Mental Spatial Knowledge Processing. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):778-795.
David Kirsh (1992). PDP Learnability and Innate Knowledge of Language. In S. Davis (ed.), Connectionism: Theory and practice (Volume III of The Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press
Gezinus Wolters & R. Hans Phaf (1999). Constructing Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):174-174.
Michael R. W. Dawson & C. Darren Piercey (2001). On the Subsymbolic Nature of a PDP Architecture That Uses a Nonmonotonic Activation Function. Minds and Machines 11 (2):197-218.
Bruce Mangan (1999). What's New Here? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):160-161.
Ronald L. Chrisley (1992). Connectionism, Cognitive Maps and the Development of Objectivity. School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.
William P. Bechtel (1988). Connectionism and Rules and Representation Systems: Are They Compatible? Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):5-16.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #582,557 of 1,780,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,797 of 1,780,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?