Could There be Another Galileo Case?

Journal of Religion and Society 4 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his 1615 letter to the Grand Duchess Christina of Lorraine, Galileo argues for a “principle of limitation”: the authority of Scripture should not be invoked in scientific matters. In doing so, he claims to be following the example of St Augustine. But Augustine’s position would be better described as a “principle of differing purpose”: although the Scriptures were not written in order to reveal scientific truths, such matters may still be covered by biblical authority. The Roman Catholic Church has rejected Galileo’s principle, opting rather for Augustine’s, leaving open the possibility of future conflicts between scientists and Church authority.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Galileo's theological venture.Ernan McMullin - 2013 - Zygon 48 (1):192-220.
Galileo and the Philosophy of Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
Heretics Everywhere.J. Aaron Simmons - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1-2):49-76.
Galileo, rationality and explanation.Joseph C. Pitt - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-20

Downloads
588 (#28,880)

6 months
126 (#27,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory W. Dawes
University of Otago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references