Graduate studies at Western
Louvain Studies 32 (1-2):67-80 (2007)
|Abstract||David Friedrich Strauss is best known for his mythical interpretation of the Gospel narratives. He opposed both the supernaturalists (who regarded the Gospel stories as reliable) and the rationalists (who offered natural explanations of purportedly supernatural events). His mythical interpretation suggests that many of the stories about Jesus were woven out of pre-existing messianic beliefs and expectations. Picking up this suggestion, I argue that the Gospel writers thought paradigmatically rather than historically. A paradigmatic explanation assimilates the event-to-be- explained to what is thought to be a prototypical instance of divine action. It differs from a historical or scientific explanation insofar as it does not specify the conditions under which it should be applied. It is, therefore, a wonderfully flexible way to understand the present in the light of the past.|
|Keywords||history explanation David Friedrich Strauss historiography deductive-nomological Carl Hempel science and religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wesley C. Salmon (1974). Comments on 'Hempel's Ambiguity' by J. Alberto Coffa. Synthese 28 (2):165 - 169.
Raoul Gervais & Erik Weber (2011). The Covering Law Model Applied to Dynamical Cognitive Science: A Comment on Joel Walmsley. Minds and Machines 21 (1):33-39.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2006). The Truth About Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American Democracy. University of Chicago Press.
David Pearce & Veikko Rantala (1985). Approximative Explanation is Deductive-Nomological. Philosophy of Science 52 (1):126-140.
Thomas Nickles (1971). Covering Law Explanation. Philosophy of Science 38 (4):542-561.
Edmund Nierlich (1988). Die Deduktiv-Nomologische Erklärung AlS Hauptmotiv Empirisch-Wissenschaftlicher Tätigkeit. Erkenntnis 29 (1):1 - 33.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (1985). Aspects of the Logic of History-of-Science Explanation. Synthese 62 (3):429 - 454.
Gerhard Schurz (1995). Scientific Explanation: A Critical Survey. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 1 (3):429-465.
Robert C. Cummins (2000). "How Does It Work" Versus "What Are the Laws?": Two Conceptions of Psychological Explanation. In F. Keil & Robert A. Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition, 117-145. MIT Press.
Gerhard Schurz (1982). Ein Logisch-Pragmatisches Modell Von Deduktiv-Nomologischer Erklärung (Systematisierung). Erkenntnis 17 (3):321 - 347.
Peter Railton (1978). A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science 45 (2):206-226.
Mary B. Williams (1986). The Logical Skeleton of Darwin's Historical Methodology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:514 - 521.
Brad Weslake (2010). Explanatory Depth. Philosophy of Science 77 (2):273-294.
Added to index2012-09-21
Total downloads46 ( #28,293 of 740,104 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #5,255 of 740,104 )
How can I increase my downloads?