Segmentation and a oral status in vivo and in vitro: A scientific perspective
Bioethics 2 (1):1–14 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAndorni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann (2006). Scientific Theories as Intervening Representations. Theoria 21 (1):21-38.
Imre Kilián (2009). Ecovillages: In Vitro Sustainability. World Futures 65 (5):365-371.
H. Landecker (2002). New Times for Biology: Nerve Cultures and the Advent of Cellular Life in Vitro. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):667-694.
Stephen S. Hanson (2006). “More on Respect for Embryos and Potentiality: Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for in Vitro Embryos?”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226.
John Stewart Gordon (2008). The Status of the in Vitro Embryo. Bioethics 22 (5):296–298.
Claus Jacob (2002). Philosophy and Biochemistry: Research at the Interface Between Chemistry and Biology. Foundations of Chemistry 4 (2):97-125.
H. J. J. Leenen (1986). The Legal Status of the Embryo in Vivo and in Vitro: Research on and the Medical Treatment of Embryos. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 14 (3-4):129-132.
Andoni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann (2006). Scientific Theories as Intervening Representations. Theoria 55 (1):21 - 38.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,316 of 549,017 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
