Graduate studies at Western
Bioethics 24 (5):218-225 (2010)
|Abstract||In this paper I argue that bioethics is in crisis and that it will not have a future unless it begins to embrace a more Socratic approach to its leading assumptions. The absence of a critical and sceptical spirit has resulted in little more than a dominant ideology. I focus on three key issues. First, that too often bioethics collapses into medical ethics. Second, that medical ethics itself is beset by a lack of self-reflection that I characterize here as a commitment to three dogmas. Third, I offer a more positive perspective by suggesting how bioethics may benefit from looking towards public health ethics as a new source of inspiration and direction.|
|Keywords||public health ethics medical ethics dogmas bioethics ideology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard M. Restak (1975/1977). Pre-Meditated Man: Bioethics and the Control of Future Human Life. Penguin Books.
Nathan Emmerich (2011). Literature, History and the Humanization of Bioethics. Bioethics 25 (2):112-118.
Daniel Callahan (2000). Judging the Future: Whose Fault Will It Be? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):677 – 687.
Ronald Michael Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.) (2008). Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press.
Susan Sherwin (2011). Looking Backwards, Looking Forward: Hopes for Bioethics' Next Twenty-Five Years. Bioethics 25 (2):75-82.
Griffin Trotter (2007). Left Bias in Academic Bioethics : Three Dogmas. In Lisa A. Eckenwiler & Felicia Cohn (eds.), The Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Howard Brody (2009). The Future of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-05-04
Total downloads33 ( #41,973 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?