The problem of a material element in the cinematic sign Deleuze, Metz and Peirce
Angelaki 8 (3):155 – 166 (2003)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJanice Deledalle-Rhodes (1996). The Transposition of the Linguistic Sign in Peirce's Contributions to The Nation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (4):668 - 682.
Jarrett E. Brock (1976). Draft of a Critique of Greenlee's Peirce's Concept of Sign. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (2):111 - 126.
Alberto Toscano (2005). The Theatre of Producation: Philosophy and Individuation Bewteen Kant and Deleuze. Palgrave Macmillan.
Douglas Greenlee (1976). Peirce's Concept of Sign: Further Reflections. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (2):135 - 147.
Gérard Deledalle (1992). Peirce's "Sign": Its Concept and Its Use. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (2):289 - 301.
Douglas Greenlee (1973). Peirce's Concept of Sign. The Hague,Mouton.
David W. Agler (2010). Peirce's Direct, Non-Reductive Contextual Theory of Names. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (4):611-640.
Garin Dowd (2009). Paris and its Doubles: Deleuze/Rivette. Deleuze Studies 3 (2):185-206.
John Rajchman (2009). Futures. Deleuze's Time, or How the Cinematic Changes Our Idea of Art. In David Norman Rodowick (ed.), Afterimages of Gilles Deleuze's Film Philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads20 ( #61,563 of 549,117 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,117 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
