On häyry and Airaksinen's 'hard and soft offers as constraints'
Philosophia 20 (3):321-323 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLester E. Krueger (1998). The Ego has Landed! The .05 Level of Statistical Significance is Soft (Fisher) Rather Than Hard (Neyman/Pearson). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):207-208.
Eduardo H. Flichman (1995). Hard and Soft Accidental Uniformities. Philosophy of Science 62 (1):31-43.
Gary Watson (1999). Soft Libertarianism and Hard Compatibilism. Journal of Ethics 3 (4):351-365.
Kristin Demetriou (2010). The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
José Carmo & Andrew J. I. Jones (1996). Deontic Database Constraints, Violation and Recovery. Studia Logica 57 (1):139 - 165.
John R. Shook (2006). God's Justified Knowledge and the Hard-Soft Fact Distinction. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:69-73.
David Widerker (2002). Why God's Beliefs Are Not Hard-Type Soft Facts. Religious Studies 38 (1):77-88.
Matti Häyry & Timo Airaksinen (1990). In Defence of “Hard” Offers: A Reply to J.P. Day. Philosophia 20 (3):325-327.
Matti Häyry & Timo Airaksinen (1988). Hard and Soft Offers as Constraints. Philosophia 18 (4):385-398.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,528 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,528 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
