Our relations with the past
Philosophia 36 (4):417-427 (2008)
| Abstract | The approach that philosophers have taken to history has too often been one-dimensional. It is my aim in this paper to map out a future multi-dimensional philosophy of history, by invoking the notion of a relation with the past, and by arguing for the philosophical relevance of multiple such relations. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMolly Cochran (1999). Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Bennett Gilbert (2012). Freshest Advices on What To Do With the Historical Method in Philosophy When Using It to Study a Little Bit of Philosophy That Has Been Lost to History. Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):pdf.
John Beatty & Isabel Carrera (2012). When What Had to Happen Was Not Bound to Happen: History, Chance, Narrative, Evolution. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):471-495.
Joyce Kinoshita (1988). One Epistemological Interfield Relation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:48 - 54.
Dorothea Debus (2008). Experiencing the Past: A Relational Account of Recollective Memory. Dialectica 62 (4):405-432.
Joop Leo (2008). Modeling Relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (4).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #87,849 of 549,006 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,006 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
