Erkenntnis 33 (3):285 - 296 (1990)
|Abstract||In many applications of physics, boundary conditions have an essential role. The purpose of this paper is to examine from both a historical and philosophical perspective one such boundary condition, namely, the no-slip condition of fluid dynamics. The historical perspective is based on the works of George Stokes and serves as the foundation for the philosophical perspective. It is seen that historically the acceptance of the no-slip condition was problematic. Philosophically, the no-slip condition is interesting since the use of the no-slip condition illustrates nicely the use of scientific models. But more importantly, both the use and justification of the no-slip condition illustrate clearly how theories can holistically approach the world through model construction. Further, since much of the debate over scientific realism occurs in the realm of models, a case is made that an understanding of the role of the no-slip condition has something to offer to this debate.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Heidelberger (2006). Applying Models in Fluid Dynamics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):49 – 67.
DM Hausman & J. Woodward (1999). Independence, Invariance and the Causal Markov Condition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):521-583.
Christoph Kelp (2009). Knowledge and Safety. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:21-31.
Jonathan Vogel (2007). Subjunctivitis. Philosophical Studies 134 (1):73 - 88.
William Roche (2012). A Weaker Condition for Transitivity in Probabilistic Support. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):111-118.
Yu Qiang (2009). The Philosophies of Laozi and Zhuangzi and the Bamboo-Slip Essay Hengxian. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):88-115.
Luca Moretti (2003). Why the Converse Consequence Condition Cannot Be Accepted. Analysis 63 (4):297–300.
David H. Sanford (1976). The Direction of Causation and the Direction of Conditionship. Journal of Philosophy 73 (8):193-207.
Michael R. W. Dawson (2001). Feature Development, Object Concepts, and the Scope Slip. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1146-1147.
Mark van Atten (2005). On Gödel's Awareness of Skolem's Helsinki Lecture. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (4):321-326.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #49,576 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?