David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (2):142-159 (2006)
In the fiftieth disputation of his Disputationes metaphysicae (1597), Francisco Suárez distinguishes three notions of time. Suárez offers an account of the ways in which the predicate ‘when’ can be taken and presents a more general perspective based on the principle of duration, rather than the Aristotelian definition of time. His view differs from Aristotle’s and Aquinas’ account because Suárez emphasizes that time cannot be reduced to the number of the movement of the last sphere in the Aristotelian model of the cosmos. The intrinsic duration of a thing is its true time; this duration can be taken in an absolute or a relative sense. In an absolute sense, intrinsic time is an internal property of a thing that cannot be really distinguished from existence itself and cannot be compared with other durations. In a relative sense, we can imagine this intrinsic duration as filling up a certain interval within an infinitely extended imaginary succession. This imaginary succession is an ens rationis. The third concept of time is the Aristotelian notion: this is just an extrinsic time, a measurement of one movement by means of a comparison with another movement, especially the motion of the last sphere. Finally, in order to show the value of Suárez’s insights, I compare them with some contemporary issues in the analytic philosophy of time
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition History of Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Shields (2012). Metaphysics. Shadows of Being: Francisco Suarez's 'Entia Rationis'. In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. OUP Oxford
Joseph Glicksohn (2001). Temporal Cognition and the Phenomenology of Time: A Multiplicative Function for Apparent Duration. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):1-25.
Daniel Schwartz (2008). Francisco Suárez on Consent and Political Obligation. Vivarium 46 (1):59-81.
Theodore R. Schatzki (2006). The Time of Activity. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):155-182.
Dan Zahavi (2007). Perception of Duration Presupposes Duration of Perception - or Does It? Husserl and Dainton on Time. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):453 – 471.
Jorge Secada (2012). Suárez on Continuous Quantity. In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York
Jorge J. E. Gracia (1992). Suárez and the Doctrine of the Transcendentals. Topoi 11 (2):121-133.
Daniel Dominik Novotný (2006). Prolegomena to a Study of Beings of Reason in Post-Suarezian Scholasticism, 1600–1650. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (2):117-141.
William Lane Craig (2005). Divine Eternity and the General Theory of Relativity. Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):543-557.
Michael R. Kelly (2008). Husserl, Deleuzean Bergsonism and the Sense of the Past in General. Husserl Studies 24 (1):15-30.
Roger Ariew (2012). Descartes and Leibniz as Readers of Suárez: Theory of Distinctions and Principle of Individuation. In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. OUP Oxford
Denis Corish (2006). Time Reconsidered. Philosophy 81 (1):81-106.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads41 ( #100,032 of 1,796,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #350,287 of 1,796,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?