David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (2):245-260 (2005)
In Descartes’s reformulation of natural philosophy, two aspects of what came to be known as the mechanical philosophy were intimately joined: mechanism as an ontology of nature, according to which all natural things had only ‘mechanical’ properties; and mechanism as a method of explanation. One could, and many philosophers did, adopt mechanism as a method of explanation without adopting a mechanistic ontology. I examine two successors of Descartes who did just that, and one who did not. Giovanni Alfonso Borelli in his De motu animalium and Charles Perrault in his Mécanique de animaux propose and argue for a variety of mechanical accounts of the operations of animals, in particular of their muscles. They reject, however, the Cartesian reduction of animal souls to mechanical forces; the principle of animal motion for them remains a non-mechanical soul. Pierre Sylvain Régis in his Cours entier de philosophie follows Descartes in taking the ‘physical cause’ of motion in animals to be the fermentation of blood in the heart, and thus denies animal souls any role in his physiology. That he can do so while taking over, sometimes word for word, Perrault’s accounts of animal motion shows that mechanistic explanation and mechanistic ontology could easily part company
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hylarie Kochiras (2013). The Mechanical Philosophy and Newton's Mechanical Force. Philosophy of Science 80 (4):557-578.
Similar books and articles
Dennis Des Chene (2003). Life After Descartes: Régis on Generation. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):410-420.
Dennis Des Chene (2003). Life After Descartes: Regis on Generation. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):410-420.
T. Sorell (1993). Seventeenth-Century Materialism. In G. H. R. Parkinson (ed.), The Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Rationalism. Routledge
Dennis des Chene (2006). Régis and Rohault. In Don Rutherford (ed.), Cambridge companion to early modern philosophy.
Samuel Leslie Bethell (1951). The Cultural Revolution of the Seventeenth Century. London, D. Dobson.
Richard Whitlock (1949). Two Seventeenth-Century Prefaces: Zootomia, 1654. [Liverpool]University Press of Liverpool.
Wiep van Bunge (2001). From Stevin to Spinoza: An Essay on Philosophy in the Seventeenth-Century Dutch Republic. Brill.
Susan James (1997). Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Nathan Alexander (2007). The Visibilité of the Hidden God. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):151-170.
Paolo Mancosu (1996). Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford University Press.
Geoffrey Gorham (2009). God and the Natural World in the Seventeenth Century: Space, Time, and Causality. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):859-872.
Régis Morelon (1994). Ṯābit B. Qurra and Arab Astronomy in the 9th Century. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4 (1):111.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads5 ( #506,084 of 1,902,209 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,168 of 1,902,209 )
How can I increase my downloads?