Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Claudio de Almeida (2007). Closure, Defeasibility and Conclusive Reasons. Acta Analytica 22 (4).It is argued, on the basis of new counterexamples, that neither knowledge nor epistemic justification (or “epistemic rationality”) can reasonably be thought to be closed under logical implication. The argument includes an attempt to reconcile the fundamental intuitions of the opposing parties in the debate.
Discussion of Claudio de Almeida, Closure, defeasibility and conclusive reasons
Nothing in this forum yet.
