Incompatible versions of authority in law and science
Social Epistemology 13 (2):147 – 164 (1999)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJoseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Jon Garthoff (2010). Legitimacy is Not Authority. Law and Philosophy 29 (6):669-694.
J. Roland Pennock & John William Chapman (eds.) (1987). Authority Revisited. New York University Press.
Bert van Roermund (2000). Authority and Authorisation. Law and Philosophy 19 (2).
John O'Neill (1995). Intrinsic Evil, Truth and Authority. Religious Studies 31 (2):209 - 219.
B. Celano (2000). Kelsen's Concept of the Authority of Law. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):173-199.
Joseph Raz (2009). Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.
B. Roermund (2000). Authority and Authorisation. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):201-222.
Peter Rijpkema (2011). The Inevitability of Moral Evaluation. Ratio Juris 24 (4):413-434.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 549,700 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,700 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
