A Critique of Superson's Feminist Definition of Sexual Harassment
Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (1):49-62 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLinda Lemoncheck (1998). Loose Women, Lecherous Men: A Feminist Philosophy of Sex. Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):369-373.
Christine L. Williams (2002). Sexual Harassment and Sadomasochism. Hypatia 17 (2):99-117.
Karen A. Crain & Kenneth A. Heischmidt (1995). Implementing Business Ethics: Sexual Harassment. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):299 - 308.
Iddo Landau (2004). Sexual Harassment and the "Repetition Requirement". Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):79-83.
S. Gayle Baugh (1997). On the Persistence of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (9):899-908.
Margaret Crouch (2009). Sexual Harassment in Public Places. Social Philosophy Today 25:137-148.
M. J. Booker (1998). Can Sexual Harassment Be Salvaged? Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1171-1177.
Anita M. Superson (1993). A Feminist Definition of Sexual Harassment. Journal of Social Philosophy 24 (1):46-64.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads7 ( #133,305 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
