David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):17-29 (2010)
In their paper "Remembering," first published in the Philosophical Review in 1966, Martin and Deutscher develop what has since come to be known as the Causal Theory of Memory. The core claim of the Causal Theory of Memory runs as follows: If someone remembers something, whether it be "public," such as a car accident, or "private," such as an itch, then the following criteria must be fulfilled: 1. Within certain limits of accuracy he represents that past thing. 2. I f the thing was "public," then he observed what he now represents. If the thing was "private," then it was his. 3. His past experience of the thing was operative in producing a state or successive states in him finally operative in producing his representation. These three statements express the condition which we consider to be separately necessary and jointly sufficient, if an event is to be an instance of remembering
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dorothea Debus (2008). Experiencing the Past: A Relational Account of Recollective Memory. Dialectica 62 (4):405-432.
Dorothea Debus (2013). Thinking About the Past and Experiencing the Past. Mind and Language 28 (1):20-54.
Andrew Naylor (2012). Belief From the Past. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):598-620.
Christoph Hoerl (2014). Remembering Events and Remembering Looks. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (3):351-372.
Steven P. James (2014). Hallucinating Real Things. Synthese 191 (15):3711-3732.
Similar books and articles
Agustin Vicente (2002). How Dispositions Can Be Causally Relevant. Erkenntnis 56 (3):329-344.
Fred Adams (2011). Husker Du? Philosophical Studies 153 (1):81-94.
Christopher Read Hitchcock (1993). A Generalized Probabilistic Theory of Causal Relevance. Synthese 97 (3):335 - 364.
Luciano Floridi (2008). Understanding Epistemic Relevance. Erkenntnis 69 (1):69-92.
Carl Craver (2007). Constitutive Explanatory Relevance. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:3-20.
Kourken Michaelian (2011). Generative Memory. Philosophical Psychology 24 (3):323-342.
Adam Morton (2002). If You ’Re so Smart Why Are You Ignorant? Epistemic Causal Paradoxes‘. Analysis 62 (274):110–116.
Igal Kvart (1994). Causal Independence. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):96-114.
K. R. Stueber (2013). The Causal Autonomy of Reason Explanations and How Not to Worry About Causal Deviance. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):24-45.
John Cantwell (2010). On an Alleged Counter-Example to Causal Decision Theory. Synthese 173 (2):127-152.
Jennifer Mckitrick (2005). Are Dispositions Causally Relevant? Synthese 144 (3):357 - 371.
Eric Barnes (1995). Truthlikeness, Translation, and Approximate Causal Explanation. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):215-226.
Added to index2012-01-09
Total downloads21 ( #170,274 of 1,790,235 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #168,661 of 1,790,235 )
How can I increase my downloads?