Accounting for Epistemic Relevance: A New Problem for the Causal Theory of Memory
American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):17-29 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAgustin Vicente (2002). How Dispositions Can Be Causally Relevant. Erkenntnis 56 (3):329-344.
Fred Adams (2011). Husker Du? Philosophical Studies 153 (1):81-94.
Christopher Read Hitchcock (1993). A Generalized Probabilistic Theory of Causal Relevance. Synthese 97 (3):335 - 364.
Luciano Floridi (2008). Understanding Epistemic Relevance. Erkenntnis 69 (1):69 - 92.
Carl Craver (2007). Constitutive Explanatory Relevance. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:3-20.
Kourken Michaelian (2011). Generative Memory. Philosophical Psychology 24 (3):323 - 342.
Adam Morton (2002). If You’Re so Smart Why Are You Ignorant? Epistemic Causal Paradoxes. Analysis 62 (274):110–116.
Igal Kvart (1994). Causal Independence. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):96-114.
K. R. Stueber (2013). The Causal Autonomy of Reason Explanations and How Not to Worry About Causal Deviance. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):24-45.
Jennifer Mckitrick (2005). Are Dispositions Causally Relevant? Synthese 144 (3):357 - 371.
Eric Barnes (1995). Truthlikeness, Translation, and Approximate Causal Explanation. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):215-226.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-01-09Total downloads9 ( #114,188 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,303 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
