Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):43-57 (2010)
|Abstract||Most people's intuitive reaction after considering Nozick's experience machine thought-experiment seems to be just like his: we feel very little inclination to plug in to a virtual reality machine capable of providing us with pleasurable experiences. Many philosophers take this empirical fact as sufficient reason to believe that, more than pleasurable experiences, people care about “living in contact with reality.” Such claim, however, assumes that people's reaction to the experience machine thought-experiment is due to the fact that they value reality over virtual experiences—an assumption that has seldom (if ever) been questioned. This paper challenges that very assumption. I report some experimental evidence suggesting that the intuition elicited by the thought-experiment may be explainable by the fact that people are averse to abandon the life they have been experiencing so far, regardless of whether such life is virtual or real. I use then an explanatory model, derived from what behavioral economists and psychologists call the status quo bias, to make sense of these results. Finally, I argue that since this explanation also accounts for people's reaction toward Nozick's thought-experiment, it would be wrong to take such intuition as evidence that people value being in touch with reality|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Harriet Baber (2008). The Experience Machine Deconstructed. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):133-138.
H. E. Baber (2008). The Experience Machine Deconstructed. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):133-138.
Rupert Sheldrake (2005). The Sense of Being Stared at -- Part 1: Is It Real or Illusory? Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (6):10-31.
Christopher Belshaw (2012). What's Wrong with the Experience Machine? European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2).
Sharon Hewitt (2010). What Do Our Intuitions About the Experience Machine Really Tell Us About Hedonism? Philosophical Studies 151 (3):331 - 349.
Adam J. Kolber (1994). Mental Statism and the Experience Machine. Bard Journal of Social Sciences 3:10-17.
Marco Buzzoni (2007). Zum Verhältnis Zwischen Experiment Und Gedankenexperiment in den Naturwissenschaften. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (2):219 - 237.
Basil Smith (2011). Can We Test the Experience Machine? Ethical Perspectives 18 (1):29-51.
Added to index2010-02-09
Total downloads73 ( #14,121 of 751,029 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,846 of 751,029 )
How can I increase my downloads?