The commonsense conception and its relation to scientific theory
Philosophical Explorations 1 (1):17-30 (2001)
| Abstract | In studying what people do two points of view can be distinguished: We can choose the perspective of the actors themselves (the actor’s perspective), or we can look at what is going on from the outside, from a distance (the researcher’s perspective). Regarding the relation between both points of view three standpoints have been defended | |||||||||
| Keywords | Common Sense Conception Epistemology Mental Science | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHoward Sankey (2001). Scientific Realism: An Elaboration and a Defence. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 98 (98):35-54.
Naomi Eilan (2011). Experiential Objectivity. In Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman & Naomi Eilan (eds.), Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Maxwell (1998). The Comprehensibility of the Universe: A New Conception of Science. Oxford University Press.
David M. Armstrong (1973). Epistemological Foundations for a Materialist Theory of Mind. Philosophy of Science 40 (June):178-93.
Michael Pakaluk (2002). A Defence of Scottish Common Sense. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):564-581.
Howard Sankey (forthcoming). Science, Common Sense and Reality. In J. E. Ford (ed.), The Ontic Return: The Current Epochal Shift from Meaning to Being. Palgrave Macmillan.
Henk Bij de Weg (2001). The Commonsense Conception and its Relation to Scientific Theory. Philosophical Explorations 4 (1):17 – 30.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,255 of 550,802 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 550,802 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
