The status of constructivism in chemical education research and its relationship to the teaching and learning of the concept of idealization in chemistry
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2):153-176 (2006)
A review of the chemical education research literature suggests that the term constructivism is used in two ways: experience-based constructivism and discipline-based constructivism. These two perspectives are examined as an epistemology in relation to the teaching and learning of the concept of idealization in chemistry. It is claimed that experience-based constructivism is powerless to inform the origin of such concepts in chemistry and while discipline-based constructivism can admit such theoretical concepts as idealization it does not offer any unique perspectives that cannot be obtained from other models. Chemical education researchers do not consistently appeal to constructivism as an epistemology or as a teaching/learning perspective and it is shown that, while it draws attention to worthwhile teaching/learning strategies, it cannot be considered as foundational to chemical education research and tends to be used more as an educational label than as an undergirding theory.
|Keywords||experience-based constructivism discipline-based constructivism idealization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ronald N. Giere (1991). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Philosophical Review 100 (4):653-656.
L. Wolpert (1992). The Unnatural Nature of Science. Harvard University Press.
Robert Nola (1997). Constructivism in Science and Science Education: A Philosophical Critique. Science and Education 6 (1-2):55-83.
Michael R. Matthews (1997). Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education. Science and Education 6 (1-2):5-14.
P. S. C. Matthews (2000). Learning Science: Some Insights From Cognitive Science. Science and Education 9 (6):507-535.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Patrick Dillon (2004). Trajectories and Tensions in the Theory of Information and Communication Technology in Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (2):138 - 150.
Helmut Schwegler (2001). Physics Develops Unaffected by Constructivism. Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
Kersten Reich (2007). Interactive Constructivism in Education. Education and Culture 23 (1):7-26.
Mark Olssen (1996). Radical Constructivism and Its Failings: Anti-Realism and Individualism. British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):275-295.
Keith S. Taber (2006). Constructivism's New Clothes: The Trivial, the Contingent, and a Progressive Research Programme Into the Learning of Science. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2):189-219.
Sibel Erduran (2007). Breaking the Law: Promoting Domain-Specificity in Chemical Education in the Context of Arguing About the Periodic Law. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 9 (3):247-263.
Pedro J. Sánchez Gómez (2013). The Semantics of Chemical Education: Constructivism, Externalism and the Language of Chemistry. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 15 (1):103-116.
Robert B. Innes (2004). Reconstructing Undergraduate Education: Using Learning Science to Design Effective Courses. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Donald J. Wink (2006). Connections Between Pedagogical and Epistemological Constructivism: Questions for Teaching and Research in Chemistry. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2):111-151.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #110,842 of 1,911,524 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #179,609 of 1,911,524 )
How can I increase my downloads?