David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 12 (4):471 – 501 (1999)
Lerdahl and Jackendoff's Generative Theory of Tonal Music (GTTM) is an important contribution to cognitive science. Jackendoff claims it is a computationalist theory and that the mental representations it postulates are unconscious. Thus GTTM looks to be a kind of cognitive science remote from the folk-psychological. I argue that this picture of GTTM is mistaken: GTTM is at least as much music analysis as cognitive science. Jackendoff's metatheory fails to explain how a listener can tell that a structural description corresponds to the way she hears, how analytically minded listeners can communicate about their hearing, and how a reader of their book can comprehend it. I suggest an alternative construal, on which GTTM's analytical vocabulary functions as a public language and its mental representations are perceptual beliefs. Interesting philosophical problems ensue about knowledge of musical structure and knowledge about what structures one hears. There is a paradox: one wants an analysis to be true to a hearing, yet to be illuminating. Though analysis and hearing coincide in content at an abstract level, they do not coincide in conceptual content. What sort of knowledge then underlies the inference from perceptual to music-analytical representation? I argue that such knowledge is a priori.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Paul M. Churchland (1979). Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
John McDowell (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stephen P. Stich (1983). From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Dustin Stokes (2009). Aesthetics and Cognitive Science. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):715-733.
Similar books and articles
Mark Rollins (1999). Pictorial Representation: When Cognitive Science Meets Aesthetics. Philosophical Psychology 12 (4):387 – 413.
Byron Almén (2008). A Theory of Musical Narrative. Indiana University Press.
Lelio Camilleri (1992). On Music Perception and Cognition: Modularity, Structure, and Processing. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 2 (4):365-377.
Joseph Nathan Straus (2011). Extraordinary Measures: Disability in Music. Oxford University Press.
Martin J. Pickering & Nick Chater (1995). Why Cognitive Science is Not Formalized Folk Psychology. Minds and Machines 5 (3):309-337.
Anthony Pople (ed.) (1994/2006). Theory, Analysis and Meaning in Music. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Andrew DeBellis (1995). Music and Conceptualization. Cambridge University Press.
Mark DeBellis (1999). The Paradox of Music Analysis. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:209-217.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #94,684 of 1,790,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #429,822 of 1,790,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?