Actuality and possibility: On the complementarity of two registers in the bodily constitution of experience
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):285-305 (2009)
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the usefulness of the concept of possibility , and not merely that of actuality , for an inquiry into the bodily constitution of experience. The paper will study how the possibilities of action that may (or may not) be available to the subject help to shape the meaning attributed to perceived objects and to the situation occupied by the subject within her environment. This view will be supported by reference to empirical evidence provided by recent and current research on the perceptual estimation of distances and the effects brought about by the use of a tool on the organisation of our perceived immediate space.
|Keywords||Possibility Affordance Perception Lived body Constitution of space|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James J. Gibson (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
J. Kevin O'Regan & Alva Noë (2001). A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.
Angelo Maravita & Atsushi Iriki (2004). Tools for the Body. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2):79-86.
Shaun Gallagher & Jonathan Cole (1995). Body Image and Body Schema in a Deafferented Subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (4):369-390.
Citations of this work BETA
C. Fini, M. Brass & G. Committeri (2015). Social Scaling of Extrapersonal Space: Target Objects Are Judged as Closer When the Reference Frame is a Human Agent with Available Movement Potentialities. Cognition 134:50-56.
Similar books and articles
Frédérique de Vignemont (2011). A Self for the Body. Metaphilosophy 42 (3):230-247.
Charles Lenay (2012). Separability and Technical Constitution. Foundations of Science 17 (4):379-384.
Giovanna Colombetti (2011). Varieties of Pre-Reflective Self-Awareness: Foreground and Background Bodily Feelings in Emotion Experience. Inquiry 54 (3):293 - 313.
Adrian J. T. Smith (2009). Acting on (Bodily) Experience. Psyche 15 (1):82 - 99.
Adrian John Tetteh Smith, Bodily Experience and Bodily Self Knowledge: Feeling and Knowing Oneself as a Physical Agent.
Dorothée Legrand & Susanne Ravn (2009). Perceiving Subjectivity in Bodily Movement: The Case of Dancers. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):389-408.
Asle H. Kiran (2012). Technological Presence: Actuality and Potentiality in Subject Constitution. [REVIEW] Human Studies 35 (1):77-93.
Helena de Preester (2011). Technology and the Body: The (Im)Possibilities of Re-Embodiment. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 16 (2):119-137.
Jenny Slatman (2012). Phenomenology of Bodily Integrity in Disfiguring Breast Cancer. Hypatia 27 (2):281-300.
Added to index2009-04-27
Total downloads69 ( #58,320 of 1,789,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #54,566 of 1,789,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?