David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 14 (2-3):215-236 (2000)
Abstract Recent theories of the state often draw attention to states? autonomy from social preferences. This paper suggests that the phenomenon of public ignorance is the primary mechanism responsible for state autonomy in democratic polities. Such theorists as Skocpol and Poulantzus, who do not take account of public ignorance, either underestimate the state's autonomy or stress causal mechanisms that are necessary but not sufficient conditions for its autonomy. Gram?sci's concept of ideological hegemony is promising, even though it is far too insistent on the penetration of ideology of any kind beyond relatively small numbers of political sophisticates.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey Friedman (2005). Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The Epistemology and Politics of Ignorance. Critical Review 17 (1-2):1-58.
Earl C. Ravenal (2009). What's Empire Got to Do with It? The Derivation of America's Foreign Policy. Critical Review 21 (1):21-75.
Morgan Marietta (2010). Value Representation—the Dominance of Ends Over Means in Democratic Politics: Reply to Murakami. Critical Review 22 (2-3):311-329.
Similar books and articles
Samuel DeCanio (2000). Bringing the State Back in … Again. Critical Review 14 (2-3):139-146.
David Ciepley (2000). Why the State Was Dropped in the First Place: A Prequel to Skocpol's “Bringing the State Back In”. Critical Review 14 (2-3):157-213.
Rogan Kersh (2000). State Autonomy & Civil Society: The Lobbyist Connection. Critical Review 14 (2-3):237-258.
Charles A. Hart (1940). Philosophy of the State: The Individual; Civil Rights; the Democratic State; the Totalitarian State; the Corporative State; Church and State. [Washington, D.C.,G. Dawe].
Ahmet Öncü (2003). Dictatorship Plus Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis of the Turkish State. Science and Society 67 (3):303 - 328.
Reihan Salam (2000). The Confounding State: Public Ignorance and the Politics of Identity. Critical Review 14 (2-3):299-325.
Ted W. Meckstroth (2000). Marx and the Logic of Social Theory: The Capitalist State. Science and Society 64 (1):55 - 86.
Bruce G. Carruthers (1994). When is the State Autonomous? Culture, Organization Theory, and the Political Sociology of the State. Sociological Theory 12 (1):19-44.
Clare Chambers (2004). Are Breast Implants Better Than Female Genital Mutilation? Autonomy, Gender Equality and Nussbaum's Political Liberalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (3):1-33.
Clyde W. Barrow (2000). The Marx Problem in Marxian State Theory. Science and Society 64 (1):87 - 118.
Jukka Varelius (2011). Respect for Autonomy, Advance Directives, and Minimally Conscious State. Bioethics 25 (9):505-515.
George Sher (1997). Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
John Dewey (2012). The Public and its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads13 ( #130,128 of 1,168,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?