David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and the Environment 13 (2):pp. 35-76 (2008)
The author applies a feminist analysis to animal advocacy initiatives in which gendered and racialized representations of female sexuality are paramount. Feminists have criticized animal advocates for opposing the oppression of nonhuman animals through media images that perpetuate female objectification. These critiques are considered through a close examination of two prominent campaigns by PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). The author argues that some representations of female sexuality may align with a posthumanist feminist ethic and need not be read as sexist. Examining PETA’s famous anti-fur ads and the more recent Milk Gone Wild campaign, the author identifies where PETA’s campaigns are objectionable under a feminist ethic and where they are subversive of an anthropocentric and male-dominated order alike. The article thus recuperates part of PETA’s work from feminist critiques, but also reveals the constructions posthumanist advocacy should exclude to avoid elevating the status of nonhuman animals at the expense of women.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Tom Regan (2009). The Case for Animal Rights. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press 425-434.
S. Bordo (2004). Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. University of California Press.
Elizabeth Spelman (1988). Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Beacon Press.
Carol J. Adams (2000). The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. Continuum.
Citations of this work BETA
Corey Lee Wrenn (2016). An Analysis of Diversity in Nonhuman Animal Rights Media. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):143-165.
Similar books and articles
Bernard E. Rollin (1989). Ethical Obligations of Veterinarians and Animal Scientists in Animal Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (3):225-234.
Brett Lunceford (2010). Peta and the Rhetoric of Nude Protest. In Greg Goodale & Jason Edward Black (eds.), Arguments About Animal Ethics. Lexington Books
Kathy Rudy (2011). Loving Animals: Toward a New Animal Advocacy. Univ of Minnesota Press.
Cathryn Bailey (2007). We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegetarianism and the Reproduction of Racial Identity. Hypatia 22 (2):39-59.
Joanne Sneddon & Bernard Rollin (2010). Mulesing and Animal Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (4):371-386.
Peta Bowden (2000). An 'Ethic of Care' in Clinical Settings: Encompassing 'Feminine' and 'Feminist' Perspectives. Nursing Philosophy 1 (1):36-49.
Maurice Hamington (2008). Learning Ethics From Our Relationships with Animals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):177-188.
Ingrid Newkirk (2009). The Peta Practical Guide to Animal Rights: Simple Acts of Kindness to Help Animals in Trouble. St. Martin's Griffin.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads96 ( #41,010 of 1,793,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #71,633 of 1,793,159 )
How can I increase my downloads?