Reformed and evolutionary epistemology and the noetic effects of sin

Abstract
Despite their divergent metaphysical assumptions, Reformed and evolutionary epistemologists have converged on the notion of proper basicality. Where Reformed epistemologists appeal to God, who has designed the mind in such a way that it successfully aims at the truth, evolutionary epistemologists appeal to natural selection as a mechanism that favors truth-preserving cognitive capacities. This paper investigates whether Reformed and evolutionary epistemological accounts of theistic belief are compatible. We will argue that their chief incompatibility lies in the noetic effects of sin and what may be termed the noetic effects of evolution, systematic tendencies wherein human cognitive faculties go awry. We propose a reconceptualization of the noetic effects of sin to mitigate this tension
Keywords Reformed epistemology  Cognitive science of religion  Noetic effects of sin  Evolutionary epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    View all 28 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Alvin Plantinga (1982). On Reformed Epistemology. Reformed Journal 32 (January):13-17.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-08-25

    Total downloads

    170 ( #2,976 of 1,088,370 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    33 ( #2,615 of 1,088,370 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.