David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Poiesis and Praxis 9 (3-4):181-200 (2012)
Service robotics has increasingly become the focus of reflective research on new technologies over the last decade. The current state of technology is characterized by prototypical robot systems developed for specific application scenarios outside factories. This has enabled context-based Science and Technology Studies and technology assessments of service robotic systems. This contribution describes the status quo of this reflective research as the starting point for interdisciplinary technology assessment (TA), taking account of TA studies and, in particular, of publications from the ethical and empirical social science perspective. Finally, based on this status quo, evaluation criteria for service robots are developed, which are relevant for further reflective research
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Decker, Rüdiger Dillmann, Thomas Dreier, Martin Fischer, Mathias Gutmann, Ingrid Ott & Indra Spiecker Genannt Döhmann (2011). Service Robotics: Do You Know Your New Companion? Framing an Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 8 (1):25-44.
Martin Fischer (2012). Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment of Service Robots: The Psychological/Work Science Perspective. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (3-4):231-248.
Thomas Dreier & Indra Spiecker Genannt Döhmann (2012). Legal Aspects of Service Robotics. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (3-4):201-217.
Michael Decker & Ulrike Henckel (2012). Service Robots on Their Way? First Steps of an Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (3-4):177-180.
Ingrid Ott (2012). Service Robotics: An Emergent Technology Field at the Interface Between Industry and Services. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (3-4):219-229.
John Kohls (1996). Student Experiences with Service Learning in a Business Ethics Course. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (1):45 - 57.
Paul McIntosh (2010). Action Research and Reflective Practice: Creative and Visual Methods to Facilitate Reflection and Learning. Routledge.
Rand D. LeBouvier, Reflections in a Robot's Eye: A Cultural History and Epistemological Critque of Humanoid Robotics.
Robert Sparrow & Linda Sparrow (2006). In the Hands of Machines? The Future of Aged Care. Minds and Machines 16 (2):141-161.
R. P. B. Reuzel, G. J. van der Wilt, H. A. M. J. ten Have & P. F. Vries Robdeb (2001). Interactive Technology Assessment and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):245 – 261.
Joan L. Whipp, Terry J. Burant & Sharon M. Chubbuck (2007). The Presence and Possibility of Moral Sensibility in Beginning Pre-Service Teachers. Ethics and Education 2 (2):109-130.
Sharon M. Chubbuck, Terry J. Burant & Joan L. Whipp (2007). The Presence and Possibility of Moral Sensibility in Beginning Pre-Service Teachers. Ethics and Education 2 (2):109-130.
Emma Palese (2012). Robots and Cyborgs: To Be or to Have a Body? Poiesis and Praxis 8 (4):191-196.
Min-Sun Kim & Eun-Joo Kim (2013). Humanoid Robots as “The Cultural Other”: Are We Able to Love Our Creations? [REVIEW] AI and Society 28 (3):309-318.
John P. Sullins (2002). Building Simple Mechanical Minds: Using Lego Robots for Research and Teaching in Philosophy. In James Moor & Terrell Ward Bynum (eds.), Cyberphilosophy: The Intersection of Philosophy and Computing. Blackwell Pub.. 110-122.
Added to index2012-11-13
Total downloads2 ( #258,346 of 1,089,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,057 )
How can I increase my downloads?