The activity of French Research Ethics Committees and characteristics of biomedical research protocols involving humans: a retrospective cohort study [Book Review]

BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-10 (2005)
Background Clinical trials throughout the world must be evaluated by research ethics committees. No one has yet attempted to clearly quantify at the national level the activity of ethics committees and describe the characteristics of the protocols submitted. The objectives of this study were to describe 1) the workload and the activity of Research Ethics Committees in France, and 2) the characteristics of protocols approved on a nation-wide basis. Methods Retrospective cohort of 976 protocols approved by a representative sample of 25/48 of French Research Ethics Committees in 1994. Protocols characteristics (design, study size, investigator), number of revisions requested by the ethics committee before approval, time to approval and number of amendments after approval were collected for each protocol by trained research assistant using the committee's files and archives. Results Thirty-one percent of protocols were approved with no modifications requested in 16 days (95% CI: 14–17). The number of revisions requested by the committee, and amendments submitted by the investigator was on average respectively 39 (95% CI: 25–53) and 37 (95% CI: 27–46), per committee and per year. When revisions were requested, the main reasons were related to information to the patient (28%) and consent modalities (18%). Drugs were the object of research in 68% of the protocols examined. The majority of the research was national (80%) with a predominance of single-centre studies. Workload per protocol has been estimated at twelve and half hours on average for administrative support and at eleven and half hours for expertise. Conclusion The estimated workload justifies specific and independent administrative and financial support for Research Ethics Committees.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-6-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
François-André Isambert (1989). Ethics Committees in France. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):445-456.
Paolo Cattorini (1993). Bioethics and Ethics Committees in Italy. The Present Situation and the Perspectives. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 1 (1):129-136.
David Shaw (2011). The Ethics Committee as Ghost Author. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):706-706.
Paulina Tindana & Okyere Boateng (2008). The Ghana Experience. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (4):277-281.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

16 ( #280,365 of 1,908,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #452,418 of 1,908,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.