Toward a Postcolonial, Posthumanist Feminist Theory: Centralizing Race and Culture in Feminist Work on Nonhuman Animals
Hypatia 27 (3):527-545 (2012)
| Abstract | Posthumanist feminist theory has been instrumental in demonstrating the salience of gender and sexism in structuring human–animal relationships and in revealing the connections between the oppression of women and of nonhuman animals. Despite the richness of feminist posthumanist theorizations it has been suggested that their influence in contemporary animal ethics has been muted. This marginalization of feminist work—here, in its posthumanist version—is a systemic issue within theory and needs to be remedied. At the same time, the limits of posthumanist feminist theory must also be addressed. Although posthumanist feminist theory has generated a sophisticated body of work analyzing how gendered and sexist discourses and practices subordinate women and animals alike, its imprint in producing intersectional analyses of animal issues is considerably weaker. This leaves theorists vulnerable to charges of essentialism, ethnocentrism, and elitism despite best intentions to avoid such effects and despite commitments to uproot all forms of oppression. Gender-focused accounts also preclude understanding of the importance of race and culture in structuring species-based oppression. To counter these undesirable pragmatic and conceptual developments, posthumanist feminist theory needs to engender feminist accounts that centralize the structural axes of race and culture | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesManeesha Deckha (2008). Disturbing Images: Peta and the Feminist Ethics of Animal Advocacy. Ethics and the Environment 13 (2):pp. 35-76.
Maurice Hamington (ed.) (2010). Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Lisa H. Weasel (2004). Feminist Intersections in Science: Race, Gender and Sexuality Through the Microscope. Hypatia 19 (1):183-193.
Joan Alway (1995). The Trouble with Gender: Tales of the Still-Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociological Theory. Sociological Theory 13 (3):209-228.
L. Ryan Musgrave (2003). Liberal Feminism, From Law to Art: The Impact of Feminist Jurisprudence on Feminist Aesthetics. Hypatia 18 (4):214-235.
Kate Sutherland (2005). Marx and MacKinnon: The Promise and Periis of Marxism for Feminist Legal Theory. Science and Society 69 (1):113 - 132.
Louise C. Johnson (2000). Placebound: Australian Feminist Geographies. Oxford University Press.
Estella Lauter (1990). Re-Enfranchising Art: Feminist Interventions in the Theory of Art. Hypatia 5 (2):91 - 106.
Robyn Ferrell (1991). The Passion of the Signifier and the Body in Theory. Hypatia 6 (3):172 - 184.
Kimberle Crenshaw (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 140:139-167.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-05-01Total downloads7 ( #134,983 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
