Philosophy Compass 3 (5):894-909 (2008)
|Abstract||Aesthetic properties are often thought to have either no evaluative component or an evaluative component that can be isolated from their descriptive component. The present article argues that this popular view is without adequate support. First, doubt is cast on the idea that some paradigmatic aesthetic properties are purely descriptive. Second, the idea that the evaluative component of an aesthetic property can always be neatly separated from its descriptive component is called into question. Meanwhile, a speculative hypothesis is launched regarding the structure of being garish and being cacophonous. Finally, an explanation is given of how the issue of the structure of aesthetic properties bears on their reality and (presumed) response-dependence.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jerrold Levinson (2005). What Are Aesthetic Properties? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79:191 - 227.
Nick Zangwill (2000). Skin Deep or in the Eye of the Beholder?: The Metaphysics of Aesthetic and Sensory Properties. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):595-618.
Rafael De Clercq (2002). The Concept of an Aesthetic Property. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):167–176.
Robert Fudge (2005). A Vindication of Strong Aesthetic Supervenience. Philosophical Papers 34 (2):149-171.
Crispin Sartwell (forthcoming). The Shape of the World: What If Aesthetic Properties Were Real? Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 22.
Rafael de Clercq (2005). Aesthetic Terms, Metaphor, and the Nature of Aesthetic Properties. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):27–32.
Aaron Smuts (2011). Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads95 ( #6,890 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?