How to go nowhere with language: Remarks on John O'Callaghan, thomist realism and the linguistic turn
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):337-359 (2008)
Jacques Maritain tells us that, apart from St. Thomas himself, his “principal teacher” in Thomism was John Poinsot. Poinsot, like Maritain and Thomas, expressly teaches that the basis of “Thomist realism” lies in the distinction between sentire, which makes no use of concepts, and phantasiari and intelligere, which together depend essentially on concepts. O’Callaghan makes no discussion of this point, resting his notion of realism rather on the widespread quo/quod fallacy, that is, the misinterpretation of concepts as the id quo of knowing. Poinsot demonstrates that this view conflates the distinct notions of species expressae and species impressae, demonstrating further that concepts as such cannot provide the cognitive basis of realism. O’Callaghan in effect suppresses the distinction betweenobjects and things in his effort to achieve the impossible. In this review, I show that it is a question of semantics vs. semiotics over which O’Callaghan stumblesin misrepresenting “Thomist realism.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
P. Kyle Stanford (1995). For Pluralism and Against Realism About Species. Philosophy of Science 62 (1):70-91.
John P. O'Callaghan (1997). The Problem of Language and Mental Representation in Aristotle and St. Thomas. Review of Metaphysics 50 (3):499 - 545.
John O'Callaghan (1999). Concepts, Beings, and Things in Contemporary Philosophy and Thomas Aquinas. Review of Metaphysics 53 (1):69 - 98.
John N. Deely (2008). Descartes & Poinsot: The Crossroad of Signs and Ideas. University of Scranton Press.
Robert Miner (2003). Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn. Review of Metaphysics 57 (2):427-430.
Susan Brower-Toland (2003). Review of John O'Callaghan, Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form of Existence. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (8).
John O'Callaghan (2010). Concepts, Mirrors, and Signification. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):133-162.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #78,528 of 1,696,650 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #58,234 of 1,696,650 )
How can I increase my downloads?