Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the infomediary process [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):541 - 553 (2009)
|Abstract||When do organizations decide to ‘adopt’ a given social issue such that they come to acknowledge it in their patterns of action and communication? Traditional answers to this question have focused either on the characteristics of the issue itself, or on the traits of the focal organization. In many cases, however, a firm’s decision to adopt or ignore an issue is not a straightforward function of firm or issue characteristics. Instead, we view issue adoption as a socially constructed process of information exchange between parties that are involved in the emergence and evolution of the issue, mediated by third-party organizations. We refer to this process as the infomediary process and these latter organizations as ‘infomediaries,’ after the information mediation and brokerage roles they play in the social processes linking social issues to organizational impact. We present a concise theoretical model of how infomediaries establish credible linkages between focal organizations and social issues. The thrust of the model is that the infomediation process, rather than the issue or firm characteristics, is what really drives firm-level issue adoption decisions.|
|Keywords||issues management news media stakeholder theory infomediary organizations strategic decision making social construction of reality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Donald Vredenburgh & Yael Brender (1998). The Hierarchical Abuse of Power in Work Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1337-1347.
Antonino Vaccaro (2012). To Pay or Not to Pay? Dynamic Transparency and the Fight Against the Mafia's Extortionists. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):23-35.
Jeanne M. Logsdon & Kristi Yuthas (1997). Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1213-1226.
Patricia C. Kelley & Dawn R. Elm (2003). The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones's Issue-Contingent Model. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):139 - 154.
Susan J. Harrington (1997). A Test of a Person -- Issue Contingent Model of Ethical Decision Making in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):363-375.
Jo-Ellen Pozner (2008). Stigma and Settling Up: An Integrated Approach to the Consequences of Organizational Misconduct for Organizational Elites. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (1):141 - 150.
Sally Bean (2011). Navigating the Murky Intersection Between Clinical and Organizational Ethics: A Hybrid Case Taxonomy. Bioethics 25 (6):320-325.
Jan Lepoutre & Aimé Heene (2006). Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3):257 - 273.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?